What if the road owner doesn’t give you access to the roads? The revisited Chris Christie Edition

I’m sorry, but I’m smiling about this Chris Christie “Bridgegate” scandal.  I’m smiling because one of the most loved reasons to reject private ownership of roads is the chance that an owner may not give you access to his road for some reason, maybe because he doesn’t like you.

Well, this is what people are accusing the government of doing.  And even though it hasn’t been proven that the lanes of this road were closed for political reasons, people seem very willing to believe that it was.

So if you believe that the government would close a road because they don’t like someone, how can you use that as an argument against private roads?

And I have to say it: without government, who would block access to the roads?

About these ads

2 thoughts on “What if the road owner doesn’t give you access to the roads? The revisited Chris Christie Edition

  1. Don’t get me wrong. I hate pretty much everything government does and don’t believe they have the ability to property look after the roads. I do share the concern that you might denied access to a road for any number of reasons. Of course if the road owner pulls a dirty trick like that-others will hear about it. The media will report it and he will pay the consequence for being an idiot.

    The government as the owner of most roads can do anything they want-and they do, blocking roads all the time!

    Like this

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s